<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568</id><updated>2008-08-18T13:42:15.148-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Myrtle Beach Lawyer News</title><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/myrtle-beach-lawyers.html'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default'/><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>34</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-3716368050229040718</id><published>2008-06-24T09:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-24T14:46:27.182-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Special US terrorism courts would threaten Constitution: report</title><content type='html'> [JURIST] Special national security courts to try terrorism suspects are "unnecessary" and "dangerous to traditional constitutional protections," according to a report [text, PDF; advocacy press release] issued Monday by the Constitution Project [advocacy website]. The report was endorsed by a panel of national security experts and legal scholars including General Wesley Clark, Yale Law School  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/06/special-us-terrorism-courts-would.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-06-23T15:07:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/06/special-us-terrorism-courts-would.html' title='Special US terrorism courts would threaten Constitution: report'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/3716368050229040718'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/3716368050229040718'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-7493795482756669</id><published>2008-06-24T09:15:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-24T14:22:48.299-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Federal appeals court overturns enemy combatant status of Guantanamo detainee</title><content type='html'>[JURIST] A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit Monday ordered [PDF text] the US government to release or transfer a Chinese Uighur Muslim [JURIST news archive] detained at Guantanamo Bay, ruling that Huzaifa Parhat had been improperly designated as an enemy combatant by a US Combatant Status Review Tribunal [DOD materials].  Barring release or transfer, the order  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/06/federal-appeals-court-overturns-enemy.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-06-23T15:07:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/06/federal-appeals-court-overturns-enemy.html' title='Federal appeals court overturns enemy combatant status of Guantanamo detainee'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/7493795482756669'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/7493795482756669'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-3094025808550144183</id><published>2008-06-15T09:15:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-15T09:53:32.065-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Abuses of the Takings Clause - Your Home Could Be Next</title><content type='html'>A look at the abuses of the takings clause by the government which has left citizens destitute and homeless.  The work gives special attention to the famous case: Kelo vs. New London.  A short read will give you the info you need to protect your rights as a homeowner. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Abuses-of-the-Takings-Clause-Your-Home-Could-Be-Next&amp;id=1241249" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:55:30 -0500&lt;/a&gt;</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/06/abuses-of-takings-clause-your-home.html' title='Abuses of the Takings Clause - Your Home Could Be Next'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/3094025808550144183'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/3094025808550144183'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-4917887488896866631</id><published>2008-06-10T09:15:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-10T09:15:21.081-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Virginia upholds Vermont grant of same-sex ex-partner child visitation rights</title><content type='html'>[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Virginia [official website] has upheld [ruling, PDF] the visitation rights of a woman seeking visitation rights to a child born to her former lesbian partner while the two were engaged in a same-sex union under Vermont law [Vermont Act 91 text].  Without reaching the merits of the case [press release], the court ruled Friday for Janet Jenkins against Lisa Miller,  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/06/virginia-upholds-vermont-grant-of-same.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-06-09T12:53:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/06/virginia-upholds-vermont-grant-of-same.html' title='Virginia upholds Vermont grant of same-sex ex-partner child visitation rights'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/4917887488896866631'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/4917887488896866631'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-6249600814417371496</id><published>2008-06-10T09:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-10T09:15:16.140-04:00</updated><title type='text'>American Indian trust mismanagement case goes to trial</title><content type='html'> [JURIST] The US District Court for the District of Columbia [court website] began hearings Monday in Cobell v. Kempthorne [plaintiff's website; DOJ materials], a class-action suit brought in 1996 alleging US government mismanagement of trust funds for a group of some 500,000 Native Americans and their heirs. Judge James Robertson [official profile] will decide how much the government owes the  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/06/century-old-american-indian-trust-claim.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-06-09T12:53:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/06/american-indian-trust-mismanagement.html' title='American Indian trust mismanagement case goes to trial'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/6249600814417371496'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/6249600814417371496'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-2301545500672682141</id><published>2008-06-01T09:15:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-01T09:17:05.008-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Executing a Power of Attorney to Help Prevent Foreclosure</title><content type='html'> One of the most serious decisions homeowners facing foreclosure may be asked to make is to sign over the deed to their home. Transferring ownership of the property diminishes their ability to keep control over the house, and may just reward a scammer with an easy target. Just as serious and potentially dangerous, though, is the decision to sign over a power of attorney to a third party to represent the homeowners. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Executing-a-Power-of-Attorney-to-Help-Prevent-Foreclosure&amp;id=1170684" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wed, 14 May 2008 13:47:19 -0500&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/06/executing-power-of-attorney-to-help.html' title='Executing a Power of Attorney to Help Prevent Foreclosure'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/2301545500672682141'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/2301545500672682141'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-3764751637920736710</id><published>2008-05-27T09:15:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-27T09:15:14.756-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Mukasey defends government lawyers who wrote interrogation memos</title><content type='html'>[JURIST] US Attorney General Michael Mukasey [official profile; JURIST news archive] defended Bush administration attorneys who authored memoranda supporting the legality of coercive interrogating tactics - the so-called "torture memos" [JURIST news archive] - in a commencement address [text] to Boston College Law School graduates Friday. Emphasizing the legal complexity of the issues raised in  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/05/mukasey-defends-government-lawyers-who.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-05-25T14:27:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/05/mukasey-defends-government-lawyers-who.html' title='Mukasey defends government lawyers who wrote interrogation memos'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/3764751637920736710'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/3764751637920736710'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-4470080006815934125</id><published>2008-05-27T09:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-27T09:15:14.559-04:00</updated><title type='text'>OPEC antitrust bill 'projection of US economic problems': Iran oil official</title><content type='html'> [JURIST] National Iranian Oil Co. [corporate website] Director of International Affairs Hojatollah Ghanimi Fard [profile, in Persian] derided US bill HR 6074 [materials] on Saturday, calling it "inexpert" and "a projection of US economic problems" in an interview with Shana [Shana.ir report], the news service of the Iranian Ministry of Petroleum [official website, in Persian]. The proposed  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/05/iran-oil-official-opec-antitrust-bill.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-05-25T14:27:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/05/opec-antitrust-bill-projection-of-us.html' title='OPEC antitrust bill &apos;projection of US economic problems&apos;: Iran oil official'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/4470080006815934125'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/4470080006815934125'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-624454448031268053</id><published>2008-05-18T09:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-18T09:15:20.879-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Executing a Power of Attorney to Help Prevent Foreclosure</title><content type='html'> One of the most serious decisions homeowners facing foreclosure may be asked to make is to sign over the deed to their home. Transferring ownership of the property diminishes their ability to keep control over the house, and may just reward a scammer with an easy target. Just as serious and potentially dangerous, though, is the decision to sign over a power of attorney to a third party to represent the homeowners. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Executing-a-Power-of-Attorney-to-Help-Prevent-Foreclosure&amp;id=1170684" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wed, 14 May 2008 13:47:19 -0500&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/05/executing-power-of-attorney-to-help.html' title='Executing a Power of Attorney to Help Prevent Foreclosure'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/624454448031268053'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/624454448031268053'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-6824660172337593287</id><published>2008-05-13T09:15:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-13T09:17:01.038-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Supreme Court affirms ruling allowing anti-apartheid claims to proceed after recusals</title><content type='html'>[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] Monday affirmed [PDF text] a judgment by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on an anti-apartheid claims lawsuit on the rare grounds that it lacked a quorum due to four recusals. Am. Isuzu Motors, Inc., et al. v. Ntsebeza, Lungisile, et al involved a huge class of plaintiffs suing several dozen companies which did  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/05/supreme-court-affirms-ruling-allowing.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-05-12T14:39:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/05/supreme-court-affirms-ruling-allowing.html' title='Supreme Court affirms ruling allowing anti-apartheid claims to proceed after recusals'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/6824660172337593287'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/6824660172337593287'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-2271008962698204186</id><published>2008-05-13T09:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-13T09:15:11.087-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Supreme Court takes death row habeas claim</title><content type='html'> [JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] granted limited certiorari Monday in Bell v. Kelly (07-1223) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], where it will consider whether the US Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when, in conflict with decisions of the Ninth and Tenth Circuits, it applied the deferential standard of 28 U.S.C. � 2254(d), reserved for claims "adjudicated on &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/05/supreme-court-takes-death-row-habeas.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-05-12T14:39:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/05/supreme-court-takes-death-row-habeas.html' title='Supreme Court takes death row habeas claim'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/2271008962698204186'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/2271008962698204186'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-4389050704891574632</id><published>2008-05-04T09:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-04T09:15:11.722-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Jingle Mail And California Law - Giving The Mortgage Back To The Bank</title><content type='html'> If you owe $800,000 on a $550,000 house, and give the bank the $550,000 house, can the bank then try to collect the $250,000 difference? Or to use the legal terminology, can the bank seek a deficiency judgment?  The answer, in California, is probably not... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Jingle-Mail-And-California-Law-Giving-The-Mortgage-Back-To-The-Bank&amp;id=1127393" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:25:46 -0500&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/05/jingle-mail-and-california-law-giving.html' title='Jingle Mail And California Law - Giving The Mortgage Back To The Bank'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/4389050704891574632'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/4389050704891574632'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-9145417570238887029</id><published>2008-04-29T09:15:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-29T09:17:00.127-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Pfizer resumes settlement talks with Nigeria state over drug trial lawsuit</title><content type='html'>[JURIST] US pharmaceutical giant Pfizer [corporate website] resumed settlement negotiations with the Nigerian state of Kano for allegedly illegal clinical trials conducted by the drug company, Kano state Justice Commissioner Aliyu Umar said Monday. Pfizer is accused of administering 200 Nigerian children with meningitis medication - including 100 with the then-experimental anti-biotic Trovan [FDA &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/04/pfizer-resumes-settlement-talks-with.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-04-28T17:37:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/04/pfizer-resumes-settlement-talks-with.html' title='Pfizer resumes settlement talks with Nigeria state over drug trial lawsuit'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/9145417570238887029'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/9145417570238887029'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-7061584213195583347</id><published>2008-04-29T09:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-29T09:15:26.035-04:00</updated><title type='text'>US House panel threatens to subpoena Ashcroft on DOJ interrogation memo</title><content type='html'> [JURIST] US House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) [official website] Monday threatened to seek subpoenas [materials] to compel three current and former administration officials, including former Attorney General John Ashcroft [official profile], to testify about a recently released Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel memorandum [text; JURIST report] that advised the US  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/04/us-house-panel-threatens-to-subpoena.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-04-28T17:37:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/04/us-house-panel-threatens-to-subpoena.html' title='US House panel threatens to subpoena Ashcroft on DOJ interrogation memo'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/7061584213195583347'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/7061584213195583347'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-622425687823474537</id><published>2008-04-20T09:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-20T09:15:19.658-04:00</updated><title type='text'>When The Foreclosure Lawsuit Comes, How Do You File An Answer To The Bank's Complaint?</title><content type='html'> In nearly all cases of foreclosure, when the bank files its initial lawsuit, the homeowners have a chance to respond to the complaint and file their own answer. The problem is that, while mortgage companies hire local lawyers, the owners of the house may have little idea of how to go about filing an answer. While this is an extremely variable topic, with local, county, and state rules all coming into play, a small introduction may help homeowners find the confidence to take on the bank in court. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?When-The-Foreclosure-Lawsuit-Comes,-How-Do-You-File-An-Answer-To-The-Banks-Complaint?&amp;id=1119386" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:00:53 -0500&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/04/when-foreclosure-lawsuit-comes-how-do.html' title='When The Foreclosure Lawsuit Comes, How Do You File An Answer To The Bank&apos;s Complaint?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/622425687823474537'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/622425687823474537'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-7193938832068277354</id><published>2008-04-15T09:15:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-15T09:15:19.772-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Federal appeals judge appointed to top post at FISA review court</title><content type='html'>[JURIST] Bruce Selya [official profile], a senior circuit judge for the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has been designated as presiding judge of the US Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review [FJC backgrounder]. The designation was made by US Chief Justice John Roberts [Oyez profile; JURIST news archive], in an order dated March 27. The appointment will be effective May 19.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/04/federal-appeals-judge-appointed-to-top.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-04-14T19:31:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/04/federal-appeals-judge-appointed-to-top.html' title='Federal appeals judge appointed to top post at FISA review court'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/7193938832068277354'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/7193938832068277354'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-2517784746824823087</id><published>2008-04-15T09:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-15T09:15:16.271-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Collapsed hedge fund co-founder sentenced to 20 years on fraud charges</title><content type='html'> [JURIST] A federal judge on Monday sentenced Samuel Israel, III, co-founder of collapsed hedge fund Bayou Group [JURIST report], to 20 years in prison. US District Judge Colleen McMahon also ordered Israel to make $300 million in restitution and forfeit interests in a $100 million account. In 2005, both Israel and Chief Financial Officer Daniel Marino pleaded guilty [JURIST report] to charges  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/04/collapsed-hedge-fund-co-founder.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-04-14T19:31:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/04/collapsed-hedge-fund-co-founder.html' title='Collapsed hedge fund co-founder sentenced to 20 years on fraud charges'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/2517784746824823087'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/2517784746824823087'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-2588872865925222574</id><published>2008-04-06T09:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-06T09:15:24.584-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Landlord-Tenant Relations in Pittsburgh, PA</title><content type='html'> Many Pittsburgh landlords are frustrated by the current state of landlord-tenant law, as many rights under current law are ceded to the tenant. Landlord frustration is especially evident in the city proper; Pittsburgh neighborhoods like Oakland and Bloomfield are filled with college students who can be noisy, negligent of property, or late with rent. However, a landlord has certain rights to his or her rental properties, and can require of tenants certain actions and behaviors that are perfectly legal. The following article will explore some landlord rights in the tenant relations and property management arenas. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Landlord-Tenant-Relations-in-Pittsburgh,-PA&amp;id=1085244" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:28:33 -0500&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/04/landlord-tenant-relations-in-pittsburgh.html' title='Landlord-Tenant Relations in Pittsburgh, PA'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/2588872865925222574'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/2588872865925222574'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-5124581304151986423</id><published>2008-03-23T09:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-23T09:15:20.078-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Expert Witness Testimony for Real Estate</title><content type='html'> Expert witness analysis and testimony provides both the parties information to settle prior to the actual judicial proceeding. When settlement negotiations are not successful, expert witness testimony provides the trier of fact (judge or jury) information to consider in making their decision. Expert witness testimony is a subset of litigation support services. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Expert-Witness-Testimony-for-Real-Estate&amp;id=1051705" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:41:22 -0500&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/03/expert-witness-testimony-for-real.html' title='Expert Witness Testimony for Real Estate'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/5124581304151986423'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/5124581304151986423'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-2517026402070084604</id><published>2008-03-18T09:15:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-18T09:15:13.971-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Federal appeals court orders new trial for Qwest ex-CEO</title><content type='html'>[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on Monday ordered [PDF text] that former Qwest Communications [corporate website] CEO Joseph Nacchio [JURIST news archive] should be retried before a new federal judge. Nacchio had appealed his April 2007 insider trading conviction [JURIST report] for selling $52 million of Qwest stock in 2001. The court found that US District Judge &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/03/federal-appeals-court-orders-new-trial.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-03-17T19:36:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/03/federal-appeals-court-orders-new-trial.html' title='Federal appeals court orders new trial for Qwest ex-CEO'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/2517026402070084604'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/2517026402070084604'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-2763587742075260099</id><published>2008-03-18T09:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-18T09:15:08.473-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Supreme Court hears arguments in Philippines assets, right to counsel cases</title><content type='html'> [JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Monday in Philippines v. Pimentel [LII case backgrounder; ABA merit briefs], 06-1204 [docket], where the Court considered whether some 9,000 plaintiffs seeking to recover assets held by former Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos [official profile] can be awarded assets claimed by &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/03/supreme-court-hears-arguments-in.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-03-17T19:36:00-04:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/03/supreme-court-hears-arguments-in.html' title='Supreme Court hears arguments in Philippines assets, right to counsel cases'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/2763587742075260099'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/2763587742075260099'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-6005097540470941346</id><published>2008-03-05T09:23:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-05T09:23:51.845-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Can The Association Deny You Access To The Association's Financial Records?</title><content type='html'> You receive information that association board members and representatives of the community management firm are having lavish dinners at some of the most expensive restaurants in the area, all at association expense. You request the association to provide you with records in order to substantiate the information that you received. The association declines to provide you with the records. Can the association be forced to provide you with these records? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Can-The-Association-Deny-You-Access-To-The-Associations-Financial-Records?&amp;id=1003168" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:44:32 -0600&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/03/can-association-deny-you-access-to.html' title='Can The Association Deny You Access To The Association&apos;s Financial Records?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/6005097540470941346'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/6005097540470941346'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-1226810802531551236</id><published>2008-02-24T09:15:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-24T09:15:23.512-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Why Use A Series LLC?</title><content type='html'> In order to diversify risk, someone with multiple rental or other investment properties would likely be advised to place each property into a separate entity.  This was traditionally achieved with the use of a corporation or limited partnership in years past.   Recently, however, the limited liability company has quickly become the entity of choice for real estate holdings. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Why-Use-A-Series-LLC?&amp;id=993264" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:21:48 -0600&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/02/why-use-series-llc.html' title='Why Use A Series LLC?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/1226810802531551236'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/1226810802531551236'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-810450224795534211</id><published>2008-02-19T09:15:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-19T09:16:46.172-05:00</updated><title type='text'>US, major EU states recognize independent Kosovo</title><content type='html'> [JURIST] The United States and several key European Union powers formally recognized Kosovo as a sovereign state Monday, one day after the Assembly of Kosovo unilaterally declared Kosovo's independence [text; JURIST report] from Serbia.  US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice issued a statement &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/02/us-major-eu-states-recognize.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-02-18T13:03:00-05:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/02/us-major-eu-states-recognize.html' title='US, major EU states recognize independent Kosovo'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/810450224795534211'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/810450224795534211'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4726933039953407568.post-3711056379807894239</id><published>2008-02-19T09:15:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-19T09:15:13.159-05:00</updated><title type='text'>US intelligence chief urges replacement surveillance bill with telecom immunity</title><content type='html'>[JURIST] A new foreign intelligence surveillance bill is needed to ensure that the US intelligence community has "the agility and the speed that we had before" to capture terrorist communications in the war on terror, US Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell [official profile] said &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/02/us-intelligence-chief-urges-replacement.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;2008-02-18T13:03:00-05:00&lt;/a&gt;        </content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/2008/02/us-intelligence-chief-urges-replacement.html' title='US intelligence chief urges replacement surveillance bill with telecom immunity'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.stanleylawfirm.com/news/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/3711056379807894239'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4726933039953407568/posts/default/3711056379807894239'/><author><name>Dr Adam</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16277758808979725654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry></feed>